By NZCMS Personnel Manager, Bruce White
One thing that vividly sits in my memory from my time with my wife, Karen, serving in Global Mission is language and culture learning. When we learned the language, the experience of hearing new sounds, understanding language and then, as we were learning a tonal language, using the wrong tone and therefore the wrong word was deeply challenging. I was reminded of our experiences recently in discussions with some Mission Partners who are also language learners. Understanding the culture they have stepped into comes from learning the language. It also creates moments of humour, often at your expense!
At NZCMS, when we consider candidates for long-term cross-cultural mission, language learning is a non-negotiable. It is not simply about being able to communicate, but also being able to step into the world of those you are doing life with so that you can understand them and their contexts. To do so, understanding their heart language is a significant starting point.
I was encouraged recently when I heard of a missional perspective that expresses these thoughts, simply known as “Vulnerable Mission”.[1] The first of four steps they reflect on in order to minister from a place of vulnerability is to speak in the language of the other.
This challenge to Vulnerable Mission reminded me of Paul’s words in Philippians 2 — “…let the same mind be in you as was in Christ”. Paul then goes on to outline the downward trajectory of Jesus to become fully human in all its rawness. There was a humbling, painful experience, especially given his previous proximity to the presence of God. Yet he did not count this as worth grasping but gave it all up freely to make a way for us to know him.
For those considering any sort of ministry engagement, but particularly cross-cultural mission, humbling ourselves, stepping into the other’s world, hearing their heartbeat, understanding their context – all this cannot be done without the humbling example of Christ.
For many of us in 2026, I would suggest that this is too much of a cost for a number of reasons.
It is time-consuming
In a generation that is moving faster and faster, slowing down and, in fact, becoming a childlike learner, is counter-cultural. Most cross-cultural workers are supported, and they can feel the subtle pressure of needing to justify their support. We can get confused about what the ‘real work’ of missions is.
Our Kiwi attitude of pragmatism and productivity is great for many things, but for many of us, slowing down and really listening is a dying art and one that can feel like wasted time. Learning a new language is a simple but profound confrontation with our assumptions about what good cross-cultural missions service is.
It is humbling
We don’t like to admit it, but there is nothing that provokes our pride more than going from knowing your place, your culture and where you fit to … what!? Being humbled in such a way can expose those hidden attitudes within us that we don’t want anyone to see. And when we are in this space, they come out. Believe me, they come out. Sometimes in ways we don’t expect or want to acknowledge.
Before my wife and I went overseas, a wise friend commented that Mission Partners often express their unspoken frustration towards Head Office. For Mission Partners, it often isn’t appropriate to critique the new culture, but Head Office can be a fair target. Sadly, I found this to be true, and language learning was one such activity that revealed the defaults in my character. I was guilty of a couple of such ‘mature’ (hear mature spoken in a sarcastic tone!) behaviour, if in thought at least. Language learning humbles us whether we like it or not, and when we’re humbled, it exposes a lot of hidden attitudes. If we are willing to acknowledge, confess and deal with them, then this is an unexpected gift.
It is the way of Jesus
Take up your cross can have many faces, but if God has called us into these cross-cultural contexts, then it is always so we can learn the ways of Jesus. A friend who lived overseas for a significant length of time, if asked, would say God had led him overseas to learn to love Jesus more. In other words, all these experiences challenge us to allow God to shape us.
So, from one who struggled with language learning, really struggled, I can attest to the humbling work of the Spirit in this process. But it taught me to be more vulnerable. To learn humility.
I am not the same person because of my time overseas. I am grateful for all I learned. And having reflected on the Vulnerable Mission perspective, I find myself challenged again to consider carefully how I (and we) are called to seek to walk with the other.
[1] https://vulnerablemission.org/
Thank you, Tessa. I remember Ray (and Jean) very warmly from our time at St Tim’s before we left for St John’s College at the beginning of 1987, and was excited many years later to learn of their visit to the Elliotts in Uganda. (We visited them in 1997 on study leave.) That visit, and a later one, showed their quiet growth in faith and mission during the years. I praise God for Ray’s life and service, and pray for the Comforter’s presence to be so close to Jean.
Hey there,
A friend of mine told me about you guys and I’d love to come along on Monday!
Cheers,
Caleb Croker
Hi Caleb, I’ve just seen your message. I apologise that this was missed. I assume you’re talking about the Seriously Interested in Mission group? The next one is August 11 and we’d love you to join. Can you email us at office@nzcms.org.nz (Rosie writing here)
Thank you Tessa
Thank you Archdeacon Fran. Mothers Union appreciated your input when we visited the Far North recently. Your wisdom and wise counsel made it a memorable weekend. God bless you in your new role.
Rev Fran, you and Rapiata are a gift to the Church. May the Lord bless you as you serve in this next season
With reference to the article ‘By invitation not invasion’. My husband and I were involved with CMS from the 1960s onward and this was always the attitude of CMS leadership. They deferred to the church leadership opinions whenever possible, wherever there was a local church. I’m not aware if this has change. It isn’t something new.
Hi Pauline,
I agree with you!! I don’t think this has changed, just good to re-iterate why and we send mission partners. This is Rosie writing — hope you’re doing well!
Yes Pauline it was the same for Alan and me. When we went to Singapore 1966–69 it was in response to a request from the Bishop oof Singapore and Malaya.